Is Increasing the Capital Gains Tax Rate the Right Way to Generate Revenue?

News, Wealth

In February, billionaires Warren Buffett and Bill Gates suggested increasing taxes on the wealthy to pay for policies that would help people without market skills keep pace in an increasingly specialized economy. Both have proposed increasing tax rates for capital gains as one potential way to generate revenue for this purpose.

Long-term capital gains, or appreciation on assets held for more than one year, are taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income when realized. For instance, the top individual income tax rate for individuals making more than $510,300 in 2019 is 37 percent, while the highest rate at which capital gains are taxed is 23.8 percent. This 23.8 percent top rate comes from the 20 percent rate for individuals with long-term capital gains over $434,550, as well as the 3.8 percent net investment income tax for individuals with modified adjusted gross income over $200,000.

One thing to recognize is that this reduced rate partially compensates taxpayers for double taxation. By the time taxpayers invest their income, that income has already been taxed by both the payroll and personal income taxes.  The capital gains tax then places an additional layer of taxation on any returns in the investment purchased with after-tax income when taxpayers realize, or sell, their asset with a capital gain.

You shouldn’t look at this double taxation in isolation, because taxpayers who invest in capital gains get the benefit of deferral, making capital gains relatively more attractive from a tax standpoint compared to other investments. As my colleague Kyle Pomerleau points out:

The effective capital gains tax rate is already relatively low compared to the effective tax rate on other sources of capital income such as dividends and interest. This is mainly because individuals can delay realizing their capital gains, which reduces the present value of the tax burden.

This means the double taxation placed on capital gains isn’t mitigated just by the reduced rate, but also by the taxpayer’s ability to choose when they want to pay taxes on the capital gain. Taxpayers would still have this ability to time their capital gains realizations even if the reduced rate were increased.

Eliminating the reduced rate on capital gains would raise revenue, but it would also increase the cost of capital and the marginal tax rate on savings and investment—meaning that this might not be the best trade-off for policymakers.  

Was this page helpful to you?

Thank You!

The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?

Contribute to the Tax Foundation


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *